Measure this.

I have read lately about the idea of using “multiple measures” to evaluate teachers.  This policy is getting much press from reformers, education officials and union leaders.  This idea is just a reaction to growing public sentiment against using student test scores to judge teachers.  The theory is that by using multiple measures we will somehow place less emphasis on the results of high-stakes exams therefore giving teachers a fair evaluation.

The bottom line is that the validity of using the results of a snap shot in time, the test, is not a true measure of student or teacher achievement regardless of the percentage value of the test score used in teacher evaluation.


In New York we can sound off about multiple measures until we are blue in the face, but the reality is that the test result is paramount in evaluating teachers.  The teacher evaluation law in New York contains this gotcha phrase:

Teachers rated ineffective on student performance based on objective assessments must be rated ineffective overall. Teachers who are developing or ineffective will get assistance and support to improve performance. Teachers who remain ineffective can be removed from classrooms.


So regardless of all of the other measures of teacher quality, if an educator has poor state assessment results that teacher is rated ineffective. Two years of ineffective ratings can lead to dismissal in New York.  The reality is that instead of the state assessment being worth 20% of a teacher’s evaluation, it is 100%.  The value of the test score gets more ominous as growth scores and value-added are phased into the evaluation process. No longer will teachers of special education, ELL and in areas of poverty be under the high-stakes testing gun- we all will.

About these ads

Comments

  1. Betsy Marshall says:

    Silencing teacher voices and privatizing education in order to give private businessmen easy access to our public coffers is all this current round of “education reform” has ever been about. Who voted to allow the businessman’s interests to supersede the interests of everyone else in this country? Bankers and businessmen need to be taken down a peg or two, or ten. It is time to bring back community involvement and collective action.

  2. It is so counter to what learning and development is all about.

  3. Thanks for noticing this “trick”–It could even be 5%–and be the only one that counts. How cme others have not rised this absurdity?

    deb

  4. And this is one of the reasons that my kids will never ever ever EVER take a state assessment if I have anything to do with it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 13,081 other followers

%d bloggers like this: