@rebelspeducator posts about our little chat at #neara2012 on Thursday

I think Rebel flatters us way too much. She was there too, ya’ know.

   The UOO people do not mince words when they have something to say. To those of you who know me personally, I will offer the following example. Just imagine a pack of Pams, only more outspoken, less afraid and in all colors, shapes and genders. They are willing to sacrifice political correctness for results. Sometimes I watch their actions in awe and other times I am fearful of the reactions that are inevitable. Although much braver than me, the leaders share my desire to somehow deliver a message without being hated for its contents. An effective group can only walk that fine line for a while. Then, its members must decide to tone down their message for a wider appeal or remain strong and grow a tougher skin.

Rebel is a true friend and sister in arms. I’m always fascinated by her stories of special education run amok in Northern Virginia.

My UOO friends may offend people with their strong use of words, but they are brave enough to say them where people are most likely to respond instead of cowering behind the door of a teacher’s lounge. They are pushing buttons that should have been pushed years ago and forcing teachers to ask how much more of our profession are we going to compromise before saying, “Enough is enough!”
Come on people, let the fireworks begin already.

Yes, fireworks, great big illegal ones that’ll blow off your facial features. Our talk at the Peace and Justice panel was certainly productive. Although, I will say in as vague terms as I can: the moderation was very strange and awkward. Witnesses will back me up on that, it was very hard to have a conversation with folks, which is why most of it occurred after our time was up. If most conversations are conducted in this way, I can’t imagine anything getting done.

About these ads

Comments

  1. Michael Paul Goldenberg says:

    I suggested that Fred’s charge of sexism didn’t hold up. He sarcastically dismissed that. Here’s my reply: Weak, sarcastic, and ultimately unconvincing, Fred. You’re indulging yourself in some pretty transparent cheap rhetorical tricks to try to deflect valid points about what went on at the convention and what continues to be weak and manipulative leadership. The sexism charge isn’t going to hold up under scrutiny because even were it true (which I very much doubt), the point remains valid: there are simply too many teachers who don’t follow education politics. That’s not speculation. It’s based on 40+ years in the field.

    I fully understand why many teachers, PARTICULARLY in the current climate, don’t feel they have time to keep a closer watch on the larger political game that is infecting public education. The job is difficult, time-consuming, and exhausting, and reading even a small percentage of what needs to be read in order to stay politically informed is challenging enough as it is.

    But seriously, without needing to bring in any contrasts that you can call “sexist” (unless you’re already planning to accuse me of that by twisting what I wrote above into some slap at (specifically) women’s intellectual capacities or commitment), I ask you: what percentage of teachers do you think followed the late Gerald Bracey’s work? He worked tirelessly to keep people informed about understanding educational statistics and research and how they’re used to fraudulently promote horrid policies. You think that folks who respond to “Clap” signs and have no problem with a convention where “politically incorrect” motions and speakers are suppressed represent an informed rank-and-file that diligently does its homework on the horrors of corporate education deform?

    I never let anti-union comments go unchallenged when they are made by folks who clearly represent people who want to see unions and collective bargaining destroyed. But I and many other educational and political progressives aren’t going to sit by quietly when anti-democratic tactics are employed within teachers’ unions, particularly not when those tactics are being used to silence anyone who isn’t toeing the party line. You can try to dismiss and others who’ve been critical of the passivity and weakness of the NEA and AFT in the face of deform (and Obama’s and Duncan’s support of it), but you need something a bit more substantive than phony accusations of “sexism.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,855 other followers

%d bloggers like this: